Shakespeare and the Imprints of Performance by J. Gavin Paul (auth.)

By J. Gavin Paul (auth.)

Show description

Read or Download Shakespeare and the Imprints of Performance PDF

Best shakespeare books

The Meaning of Shakespeare, Volume 1 (Phoenix Books)

In awesome and authoritative volumes, Harold C. Goddard takes readers on a journey during the works of William Shakespeare, celebrating his incomparable performs and unsurpassed literary genius.

Shakespearean genealogies of power: a whispering of nothing in Hamlet, Richard II, Julius Caesar, Macbeth, The merchant of Venice, and The winter's tale

Shakespearean Genealogies of energy proposes a brand new view on Shakespeare’s involvement with the felony sphere: as a visual house among the spheres of politics and legislation and good in a position to negotiate felony and political, even constitutional issues, Shakespeare’s theatre unfolded a brand new point of view on normativity.

Marketing the Bard: Shakespeare in Performance and Print, 1660-1740

To posterity, William Shakespeare could be the Bard of Avon, yet to mid-seventeenth-century theatergoers he was once simply one other dramatist. but slightly a century later, he was once England’s most well-liked playwright and a family identify. during this interesting examine, Don-John Dugas explains how those adjustments took place and sealed Shakespeare’s recognition even earlier than David Garrick played his paintings at the London level.

Shakespeare's Modern Collaborators

Fresh paintings in Shakespeare reports has delivered to the leading edge numerous ways that the collaborative nature of Shakespearean drama should be investigated: collaborative functionality (Shakespeare and his fellow actors); collaborative writing (Shakespeare and his co-authors); collaborative textual construction (Shakespeare and his transcribers and printers).

Additional resources for Shakespeare and the Imprints of Performance

Example text

37) A heightened awareness of the thorny interconnections of text and performance—Poem and Play—in editorial circles is inseparable from developments in Shakespeare studies generally. Just as editors have seen fit to give more prominence to performance within their editions (sometimes, as we see in the quotation from the Webster editors, by conceding their inability to account for it as meaningfully as they might like), so too have text and performance been continually reprioritized in other streams of critical practice.

Finding the means to address both the gaps that readers require to be filled for them and the gaps that they should fill (or at least confront) on their own in order to appreciate a playtext’s ambiguity is no easy task—the very gaps that are identified as substantive and the ways in which they are subsequently dealt with will vary from play to play, and from editor to editor. To her credit, in a subsequent essay, “Staging Shakespeare’s Drama in Print Editions,” Kidnie has explored what an edition that more fully acknowledges or “embrace[s] radical uncertainty” might look like.

In Worthen’s words, “theatrical choices arise at the intersection between the text and the formal strategies of its meaningful production as theater” (Authority 175); my intention with performancescape is to enhance awareness of such “intersections” and to foster alertness to the fact that editions, past and present, direct readers toward performance options—some of which are relatively obvious and grounded in the text, some decidedly less so.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.95 of 5 – based on 21 votes