Hegel and Shakespeare on Moral Imagination by Jennifer Ann Bates

By Jennifer Ann Bates

A learn of self-consciousness in Hegel and Shakespeare.

Show description

Read or Download Hegel and Shakespeare on Moral Imagination PDF

Best shakespeare books

The Meaning of Shakespeare, Volume 1 (Phoenix Books)

In very good and authoritative volumes, Harold C. Goddard takes readers on a journey throughout the works of William Shakespeare, celebrating his incomparable performs and unsurpassed literary genius.

Shakespearean genealogies of power: a whispering of nothing in Hamlet, Richard II, Julius Caesar, Macbeth, The merchant of Venice, and The winter's tale

Shakespearean Genealogies of strength proposes a brand new view on Shakespeare’s involvement with the criminal sphere: as a visual house among the spheres of politics and legislation and good in a position to negotiate criminal and political, even constitutional matters, Shakespeare’s theatre spread out a brand new point of view on normativity.

Marketing the Bard: Shakespeare in Performance and Print, 1660-1740

To posterity, William Shakespeare could be the Bard of Avon, yet to mid-seventeenth-century theatergoers he used to be simply one other dramatist. but slightly a century later, he used to be England’s most well-liked playwright and a family identify. during this interesting research, Don-John Dugas explains how those adjustments happened and sealed Shakespeare’s recognition even ahead of David Garrick played his paintings at the London degree.

Shakespeare's Modern Collaborators

Contemporary paintings in Shakespeare experiences has delivered to the leading edge various ways that the collaborative nature of Shakespearean drama may be investigated: collaborative functionality (Shakespeare and his fellow actors); collaborative writing (Shakespeare and his co-authors); collaborative textual construction (Shakespeare and his transcribers and printers).

Extra info for Hegel and Shakespeare on Moral Imagination

Example text

One of the characteristics of first-order negation characters is that, initially, they see themselves as being above Fortune. Thus at the start of the play, Edmund rejects the position of the stars as a reason for his having been born a bastard: This is the excellent foppery of the world, that, when we are sick in fortune . . we make guilty of our disasters the sun, the moon, and stars; as if we were villains on necessity; fools by heavenly compulsion; knaves, thieves, and treachers, by spherical predominance; drunkards, liars, and adulterers, by an enforced obedience of planetary influence; and all that we are evil in, by a divine thrusting on.

10 He explains that “dramatic action . . ” Collisions occur when “one individual’s aim encounters hindrances from other individuals . . ”12 Ancient vs. Modern Collisions Hegel distinguishes between Classical (ancient) tragedy and Modern tragedy: Modern tragedy adopts into its own sphere from the start the principle of subjectivity. 13 Thus in Othello, the collision is not overtly the divine laws governing the family versus the laws of the State (as it is for example in Sophocles’ Antigone). What constitute the main collisions are Iago’s hatred for Othello, and then the jealous fury of deceived Othello against innocent Desdemona.

Rosalind, Prospero, Cymbeline, Pericles, and other comic or romance characters have good luck in these and other respects. But good luck is not what makes comedy, nor is bad luck what makes tragedy. For the Elizabethan consciousness, what happened to these characters concerns one or all of the following: the Wheel of Fortune, Fate, or the will of Providence. References to Fortune and to the position of the stars or the Divine occur throughout Shakespeare’s plays and characters often plead with or rail against these forces.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.27 of 5 – based on 20 votes