By Andrew Cutrofello
A specter is haunting philosophy -- the threat of Hamlet. Why is that this? Wherefore? What should still we do?Entering from degree left: the philosopher's Hamlet. The philosopher's Hamlet is a conceptual personality, performed by way of philosophers instead of actors. He plays no longer within the theater yet in the area of philosophical positions. In taken with not anything, Andrew Cutrofello significantly examines the functionality historical past of this specific function. The philosopher's Hamlet personifies negativity. In Shakespeare's play, Hamlet's speech and motion are typically adverse; he's the depression Dane. such a lot could agree that he has not anything to be joyful approximately. Philosophers have taken Hamlet to include particular types of negativity that first got here into view in modernity. What the determine of the Sophist represented for Plato, Hamlet has represented for contemporary philosophers. Cutrofello analyzes 5 facets of Hamlet's negativity: his depression, unfavorable religion, nihilism, tarrying (which Cutrofello distinguishes from "delaying"), and nonexistence. alongside the best way, we meet Hamlet within the texts of Kant, Coleridge, Hegel, Marx, Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Freud, Russell, Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Benjamin, Arendt, Schmitt, Lacan, Deleuze, Foucault, Derrida, Badiou, Žižek, and different philosophers. Whirling throughout a nation of endless area, the philosopher's Hamlet is not anything if now not thought-provoking.
Read or Download All for Nothing: Hamlet's Negativity PDF
Best shakespeare books
The Meaning of Shakespeare, Volume 1 (Phoenix Books)
In remarkable and authoritative volumes, Harold C. Goddard takes readers on a travel in the course of the works of William Shakespeare, celebrating his incomparable performs and unsurpassed literary genius.
Shakespearean Genealogies of strength proposes a brand new view on Shakespeare’s involvement with the criminal sphere: as a visual house among the spheres of politics and legislation and good in a position to negotiate criminal and political, even constitutional issues, Shakespeare’s theatre unfolded a brand new point of view on normativity.
Marketing the Bard: Shakespeare in Performance and Print, 1660-1740
To posterity, William Shakespeare could be the Bard of Avon, yet to mid-seventeenth-century theatergoers he was once simply one other dramatist. but slightly a century later, he used to be England’s hottest playwright and a family identify. during this exciting research, Don-John Dugas explains how those alterations took place and sealed Shakespeare’s recognition even ahead of David Garrick played his paintings at the London degree.
Shakespeare's Modern Collaborators
Contemporary paintings in Shakespeare reports has dropped at the vanguard various ways that the collaborative nature of Shakespearean drama should be investigated: collaborative functionality (Shakespeare and his fellow actors); collaborative writing (Shakespeare and his co-authors); collaborative textual creation (Shakespeare and his transcribers and printers).
- Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation (Reproducing Shakespeare)
- The Tempest
- Coined by Shakespeare: Words and Meanings First Penned by the Bard
Extra resources for All for Nothing: Hamlet's Negativity
Sample text
Ramus also mentions Sextus in a work from 1565, though he appears to have known little about Sextus’ contributions to the development of classical scepticism. 42 Talon, whose main goal was always to promote Ramus’ educational reforms, exhibits considerable interest in Cicero’s Academica, editing the work for publication in 1548 and providing detailed commentary. This study, entitled Academia and expanded in 1550, places particular emphasis on the intellectual modesty of Academic sceptics and on the philosophical freedom their methods guarantee: It is the proper and germane liberty of the Academics … that in philosophy they submit to the laws and regulations of no man.
2 Only fools, by this rule, eschew doubt. The wise, who are of course still ignorant, at least arrive at their ignorance consciously – and through a mature habit of ‘casting’ doubt. 25). We thus need no investigation of Renaissance scepticism to account for the endorsement of doubt in English proverbial wisdom. Nor do we need such a study to provide contextual background to a work like Reginald Scot’s Discoverie of Witchcraft (1584), which deploys irony and mordant black humour in its exposé of fraud, credulity and supposed supernatural activity.
7 Erasmus also knew Galen’s The Best Kind of Teaching, which he translated in 1526, and which was frequently reprinted before appearing in the Latin editions of Sextus by Henri Estienne (1562) and Gentian Hervet (1569). 9 The a priori certainties of mathematics, in short, kept Galen from endorsing Pyrrhonism. But to the extent that Galen’s writings are also hostile to dogmatism, they resonate powerfully with the sixteenth-century revival of the anti-authoritarian attitudes of Cicero and Sextus.