By Ignacio Padilla
Ignacio Padilla nos entrega un libro de ensayos escrito a lo largo de los últimos 15 años con pasión, erudición y enorme sentido del humor. ¿Cuáles fueron las principales aportaciones de Shakespeare y Cervantes? ¿Qué pasaría si nos atreviéramos a comparar los alcances de cada uno? ¿Cómo construirían a sus personajes, por ejemplo, y cuántas de esas técnicas siguen vigentes en nuestros días, influenciando incluso a los angeles cultura well known? Y sobre todo, ¿en qué medida hemos reducido a un cliché nuestro conocimiento de ambas obras, indispensables para comprender cabalmente lo humano? Haciendo hincapié en su devoción hacia Cervantes, Ignacio Padilla nos invita a examinar los angeles obra de este autor español y cuánto perdemos si evitamos el contacto con ella.
Read or Download Cervantes y compañía PDF
Similar shakespeare books
The Meaning of Shakespeare, Volume 1 (Phoenix Books)
In extraordinary and authoritative volumes, Harold C. Goddard takes readers on a journey throughout the works of William Shakespeare, celebrating his incomparable performs and unsurpassed literary genius.
Shakespearean Genealogies of energy proposes a brand new view on Shakespeare’s involvement with the criminal sphere: as a visual house among the spheres of politics and legislation and good in a position to negotiate criminal and political, even constitutional issues, Shakespeare’s theatre spread out a brand new viewpoint on normativity.
Marketing the Bard: Shakespeare in Performance and Print, 1660-1740
To posterity, William Shakespeare could be the Bard of Avon, yet to mid-seventeenth-century theatergoers he used to be simply one other dramatist. but slightly a century later, he was once England’s preferred playwright and a family identify. during this interesting learn, Don-John Dugas explains how those adjustments took place and sealed Shakespeare’s recognition even ahead of David Garrick played his paintings at the London degree.
Shakespeare's Modern Collaborators
Fresh paintings in Shakespeare reports has delivered to the vanguard a number of ways that the collaborative nature of Shakespearean drama may be investigated: collaborative functionality (Shakespeare and his fellow actors); collaborative writing (Shakespeare and his co-authors); collaborative textual creation (Shakespeare and his transcribers and printers).
- The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare (Oxford Handbooks)
- Berryman's Shakespeare
- Shakespeare Without Women: Representing Gender and Race on the Renaissance Stage (Accents on Shakespeare)
- The Girlhood of Shakespeare's Heroines: In a Series of Fifteen Tales (Cambridge Library Collection - Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama)
- Shakespeare
Additional resources for Cervantes y compañía
Sample text
B. Nichols, 1843), 220. 22 Shakespeare and the Remains of Richard III never and was beired in a dike. John Payntor saide hit maid little mat[ter] nowther of his luff not his . . ”33 The Mayor charged both parties to keep the peace, and pursued the matter no further. Burton’s intemperate denunciation of Richard is indicative of how thoroughly memories of the late king’s memory had become associated with his body and its posthumous humiliation. 34 Likewise, the schoolmaster uses what he knows regarding Richard’s death to draw conclusion about the subsequent fate of his remains.
At the suppression of that Monastery was pulled downe, and utterly defaced; since when his grave overgrowne with nettles and weedes, is very obscure and not to be found. Onely the stone chest wherin his corpes lay, is now made a drinking trough for horses at a common Inne, and retaineth the onely memory of this Monarches greatnesse. His body also (as tradition hath 65 The Itinerary of John Leland in or about the Years 1535–1543, ed. Lucy Toulmin Smith, Volume 1 (London: G. Bell, 1907), 15. “The tomb which Leland noticed was in all probability that of Sir William Moton, of Peckleton, Knight, who, according to Burton, was buried at the church of the Grey Friars in Leicester in the year 1362”; Billson, Medieval Leicester, 78.
56 Although the two men were in fact buried in different churches, several miles apart—a fact that would have been inescapably obvious to the people of Leicester—Chapuys is unlikely to have been alone in perceiving significant parallels between the king and the cardinal. 57 This reputation allows for the buried wit of the remark quoted by Chapuys, which creates a metonymic association between Richard and Wolsey through their supposedly common sepulchre. The man buried in Richard’s tomb was a tyrant: hence, Wolsey was a tyrant.